TEST di autovalutazione

1 What was what the main argument of liquidator to sue Salomon?:
A) That the price paid by the company to Salomon exeeded the real value of the business and assets
B) The signatories of the memorandum was only dummies
C) The company was a scheme to enable him to carry business
D) The company has separate assets and liminted liability

 

2 The court of first instance decided that:
A) The company was not duly created
B) The independent board was not appointed
C) The creditors were not defrauded
D) The company was agent of Mr. Salomon

 

3 The court of Appeals decided:
A) The company was not created
B) The aim to create the company was to limit liability
C) The shareholder is not liable for the debts of the company
D) The company was trustee of Mr. Salomon

 

4 Who said the following: Mr "Salomon's scheme was a device to defraut creditors":
A) The liquidator of company
B) The Hight Court
C) The Court of Appeals
D) House of the Lords

 

5 The corporate veil mean:
A) That direcor is not liable for the activity of the company
B) That the shareholders are not liable for the debts of the company
C) That the shareholders are liable for the debts of the company
D) The director is liable for the debts of the company

 

6 The House of Lords:
A) Left the decision unchanged of the Court of Appeals
B) Reversed the decision of the Court of Appeals
C) Reversed the decision of Court of Appeals and left the decision of Hight Court
D) Left the decision of Hight Court

 

7 The shareholders of company:
A) Must be independent
B) Must corespond to requirements of intention of Legislator
C) Can be related
D) Can not pay exorbitant price for shares

 

8 In order to be recognized as a shareholder a person must have:
A) At least 1 share
B) At leat a part of a share
C) Simple majority votes
D) Qualified majority votes

 

9 When the memorandum is duly signed and registered:
A) The company is duly incorporated
B) The intention of the subcribers should be legal
C) The subscriber can not defraud each other
D) The subscribers are liable for debts of company untill company attains maturity.

 

10 In the case Gilford Motor Co v Horne court decided that:
A) The defendant controled the company and its formation was a sham.
B) The defendant's company was only dummy
C) The defendant controled the company and shareholders were puppets
D) The company is separate entity and the defendant is not liable for the activity of the company